You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Constructing classification boundaries in the memory clinic: negotiating risk and uncertainty in constituting mild cognitive impairment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sociology of Health & Illness, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9566.13016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Swallow |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 43% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 38% |
| Scientists | 7 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Psychology | 3 | 9% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,544,427
of 24,803,011 outputs
Outputs from Sociology of Health & Illness
#272
of 2,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,112
of 366,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociology of Health & Illness
#12
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,803,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.