↓ Skip to main content

Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) inhibits adhesion and migration of neural progenitor cells in vitro

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) inhibits adhesion and migration of neural progenitor cells in vitro
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00204-016-1709-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Barenys, Kathrin Gassmann, Christine Baksmeier, Sabrina Heinz, Ingrid Reverte, Martin Schmuck, Thomas Temme, Farina Bendt, Tim-Christian Zschauer, Thomas Dino Rockel, Klaus Unfried, Wim Wätjen, Sivaraj Mohana Sundaram, Heike Heuer, Maria Teresa Colomina, Ellen Fritsche

Abstract

Food supplements based on herbal products are widely used during pregnancy as part of a self-care approach. The idea that such supplements are safe and healthy is deeply seated in the general population, although they do not underlie the same strict safety regulations than medical drugs. We aimed to characterize the neurodevelopmental effects of the green tea catechin epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), which is now commercialized as high-dose food supplement. We used the "Neurosphere Assay" to study the effects and unravel underlying molecular mechanisms of EGCG treatment on human and rat neural progenitor cells (NPCs) development in vitro. EGCG alters human and rat NPC development in vitro. It disturbs migration distance, migration pattern, and nuclear density of NPCs growing as neurospheres. These functional impairments are initiated by EGCG binding to the extracellular matrix glycoprotein laminin, preventing its binding to β1-integrin subunits, thereby prohibiting cell adhesion and resulting in altered glia alignment and decreased number of migrating young neurons. Our data raise a concern on the intake of high-dose EGCG food supplements during pregnancy and highlight the need of an in vivo characterization of the effects of high-dose EGCG exposure during neurodevelopment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 21%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 14 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,141,030
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#1,913
of 2,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,546
of 298,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#18
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.