You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Physiotherapist-led treatment for young to middle-aged active adults with hip-related pain: consensus recommendations from the International Hip-related Pain Research Network, Zurich 2018
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Sports Medicine, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101458 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanne L Kemp, May Arna Risberg, Andrea Mosler, Marcie Harris-Hayes, Andreas Serner, Håvard Moksnes, Nancy Bloom, Kay M Crossley, Boris Gojanovic, Michael A Hunt, Lasse Ishøi, Nicolas Mathieu, Sue Mayes, Mark J Scholes, Mo Gimpel, Daniel Friedman, Eva Ageberg, Rintje Agricola, Nicola C Casartelli, Laura E Diamond, H Paul Dijkstra, Stephanie Di Stasi, Michael Drew, Matthew Freke, Damian Griffin, Joshua Heerey, Per Hölmich, Franco M Impellizzeri, Denise M Jones, Ara Kassarjian, Karim M Khan, Matthew G King, Peter R Lawrenson, Michael Leunig, Cara L Lewis, Kristian Marstrand Warholm, Michael P Reiman, Adam Semciw, Kristian Thorborg, Pim van Klij, Tobias Wörner, Mario Bizzini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 200 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 25 | 13% |
| United States | 24 | 12% |
| Australia | 13 | 7% |
| Spain | 11 | 6% |
| Ireland | 10 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 7 | 4% |
| France | 5 | 3% |
| Denmark | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 69 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 135 | 68% |
| Scientists | 36 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 214 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Researcher | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 82 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 18% |
| Sports and Recreations | 25 | 12% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 84 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#336,765
of 25,692,343 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#724
of 6,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,290
of 375,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#21
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,692,343 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.