↓ Skip to main content

Exome Sequencing of Familial Bipolar Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Psychiatry, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
32 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
15 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exome Sequencing of Familial Bipolar Disorder
Published in
JAMA Psychiatry, June 2016
DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0251
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando S. Goes, Mehdi Pirooznia, Jennifer S. Parla, Melissa Kramer, Elena Ghiban, Senem Mavruk, Yun-Ching Chen, Eric T. Monson, Virginia L. Willour, Rachel Karchin, Matthew Flickinger, Adam E. Locke, Shawn E. Levy, Laura J. Scott, Michael Boehnke, Eli Stahl, Jennifer L. Moran, Christina M. Hultman, Mikael Landén, Shaun M. Purcell, Pamela Sklar, Peter P. Zandi, W. Richard McCombie, James B. Potash

Abstract

Complex disorders, such as bipolar disorder (BD), likely result from the influence of both common and rare susceptibility alleles. While common variation has been widely studied, rare variant discovery has only recently become feasible with next-generation sequencing. To utilize a combined family-based and case-control approach to exome sequencing in BD using multiplex families as an initial discovery strategy, followed by association testing in a large case-control meta-analysis. We performed exome sequencing of 36 affected members with BD from 8 multiplex families and tested rare, segregating variants in 3 independent case-control samples consisting of 3541 BD cases and 4774 controls. We used penalized logistic regression and 1-sided gene-burden analyses to test for association of rare, segregating damaging variants with BD. Permutation-based analyses were performed to test for overall enrichment with previously identified gene sets. We found 84 rare (frequency <1%), segregating variants that were bioinformatically predicted to be damaging. These variants were found in 82 genes that were enriched for gene sets previously identified in de novo studies of autism (19 observed vs. 10.9 expected, P = .0066) and schizophrenia (11 observed vs. 5.1 expected, P = .0062) and for targets of the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) pathway (10 observed vs. 4.4 expected, P = .0076). The case-control meta-analyses yielded 19 genes that were nominally associated with BD based either on individual variants or a gene-burden approach. Although no gene was individually significant after correction for multiple testing, this group of genes continued to show evidence for significant enrichment of de novo autism genes (6 observed vs. 2.6 expected, P = .028). Our results are consistent with the presence of prominent locus and allelic heterogeneity in BD and suggest that very large samples will be required to definitively identify individual rare variants or genes conferring risk for this disorder. However, we also identify significant associations with gene sets composed of previously discovered de novo variants in autism and schizophrenia, as well as targets of the FRMP pathway, providing preliminary support for the overlap of potential autism and schizophrenia risk genes with rare, segregating variants in families with BD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 174 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 18%
Student > Master 23 13%
Researcher 22 12%
Other 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 14%
Psychology 21 12%
Neuroscience 20 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 11%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 46 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 199. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2017.
All research outputs
#201,937
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Psychiatry
#519
of 5,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,861
of 355,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Psychiatry
#12
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 70.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.