| Title |
Probiotics in hospitalized adult patients: a systematic review of economic evaluations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12630-019-01525-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vincent I. Lau, Bram Rochwerg, Feng Xie, Jennie Johnstone, John Basmaji, Jana Balakumaran, Alla Iansavichene, Deborah J. Cook |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 26% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 24% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 38 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,044,239
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#275
of 2,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,245
of 376,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#6
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.