↓ Skip to main content

The domain interface method: a general-purpose non-intrusive technique for non-conforming domain decomposition problems

Overview of attention for article published in Computational Mechanics, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
The domain interface method: a general-purpose non-intrusive technique for non-conforming domain decomposition problems
Published in
Computational Mechanics, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00466-015-1239-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Cafiero, O. Lloberas-Valls, J. Cante, J. Oliver

Abstract

A domain decomposition technique is proposed which is capable of properly connecting arbitrary non-conforming interfaces. The strategy essentially consists in considering a fictitious zero-width interface between the non-matching meshes which is discretized using a Delaunay triangulation. Continuity is satisfied across domains through normal and tangential stresses provided by the discretized interface and inserted in the formulation in the form of Lagrange multipliers. The final structure of the global system of equations resembles the dual assembly of substructures where the Lagrange multipliers are employed to nullify the gap between domains. A new approach to handle floating subdomains is outlined which can be implemented without significantly altering the structure of standard industrial finite element codes. The effectiveness of the developed algorithm is demonstrated through a patch test example and a number of tests that highlight the accuracy of the methodology and independence of the results with respect to the framework parameters. Considering its high degree of flexibility and non-intrusive character, the proposed domain decomposition framework is regarded as an attractive alternative to other established techniques such as the mortar approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 7%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 29%
Professor 3 11%
Librarian 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 61%
Mathematics 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2016.
All research outputs
#20,322,106
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Computational Mechanics
#209
of 254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,537
of 392,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational Mechanics
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.