| Title |
Infected chronic ischemic wound topically treated with a multi-strain probiotic formulation: a novel tailored treatment strategy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-019-2111-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Salvatore Venosi, Giancarlo Ceccarelli, Massimiliano de Angelis, Luca Laghi, Laura Bianchi, Ombretta Martinelli, Debora Maruca, Eugenio Nelson Cavallari, Fabrizia Toscanella, Paolo Vassalini, Vito Trinchieri, Alessandra Oliva, Gabriella d’Ettorre |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,016,115
of 24,039,735 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#681
of 4,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,473
of 367,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#17
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,039,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.