| Title |
Differences between diabetic and non-diabetic patients with community-acquired pneumonia in primary care in Spain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12879-019-4534-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Loreto Arias Fernández, Jacobo Pardo Seco, Miriam Cebey-López, Ruth Gil Prieto, Irene Rivero-Calle, Federico Martinon-Torres, Ángel Gil de Miguel, F. Martinón-Torres, D. Vargas, E. Mascarós, E. Redondo, J. L. Díaz-Maroto, M. Linares-Rufo, A. Gil, J. Molina, D. Ocaña, I. Rivero-Calle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Argentina | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 150 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 51 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 11% |
| Psychology | 9 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 61 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2019.
All research outputs
#5,600,442
of 23,175,240 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,658
of 7,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,157
of 358,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#23
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,175,240 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.