| Title |
Cost-effectiveness of an exercise and nutritional intervention versus usual nutritional care during adjuvant treatment for localized breast cancer: the PASAPAS randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-019-05078-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lionel Perrier, Aude-Marie Foucaut, Magali Morelle, Marina Touillaud, Anne-Sophie Kempf-Lépine, Dominik Heinz, Frédéric Gomez, Renaud Meyrand, Cédric Baudinet, Sophie Berthouze, Eric Reynes, Julien Carretier, Séverine Guillemaut, David Pérol, Olivier Trédan, Thierry Philip, Patrick Bachmann, Béatrice Fervers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 7 | 78% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 145 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 51 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 16 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 54 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,896,002
of 24,046,191 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,308
of 4,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,343
of 361,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#26
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,046,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.