↓ Skip to main content

Detection of virulence genes in resistant enterococci isolated from pediatric patients at high risk for nosocomial infections

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detection of virulence genes in resistant enterococci isolated from pediatric patients at high risk for nosocomial infections
Published in
Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease, March 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.03.020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alireza Nateghian, Fatemeh Fallah, Zahra Daghighi, Hossein Goudarzi, Ali Hashemi, Joan L. Robinson

Abstract

The study of virulence genes carried by enterococci has become of greater relevance as nosocomial enterococcal infections have become more prevalent and possibly more severe. Surveillance swabs were performed on children less than 18 months of age in an intensive care unit in Iran in 2012-2013. Multiplex PCR and sequencing methods were used to detect gelE, esp and asa1 genes in enterococci with intermediate or full resistance to vancomycin. The rate of carriage of the genes was gelE (91%), esp (79%) and asa1 (87%). The majority of enterococcal strains with resistance to vancomycin carry genes for all three potential virulence factors that were analyzed in this study. This might explain why enterococcal infections appear to be more virulent than in the past.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 36%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2016.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease
#1,973
of 2,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,336
of 315,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease
#21
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,303 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.