↓ Skip to main content

Folk Judgments About Mood Enhancement: Well-being Trumps Set Points

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Folk Judgments About Mood Enhancement: Well-being Trumps Set Points
Published in
Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s41465-019-00157-0
Authors

Jack Buchanan, Chandra Sripada

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2020.
All research outputs
#13,707,571
of 23,636,051 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,633
of 367,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,636,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.