↓ Skip to main content

Structure of an Intermediate State in Protein Folding and Aggregation

Overview of attention for article published in Science, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
337 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
357 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structure of an Intermediate State in Protein Folding and Aggregation
Published in
Science, April 2012
DOI 10.1126/science.1214203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipp Neudecker, Paul Robustelli, Andrea Cavalli, Patrick Walsh, Patrik Lundström, Arash Zarrine-Afsar, Simon Sharpe, Michele Vendruscolo, Lewis E. Kay

Abstract

Protein-folding intermediates have been implicated in amyloid fibril formation involved in neurodegenerative disorders. However, the structural mechanisms by which intermediates initiate fibrillar aggregation have remained largely elusive. To gain insight, we used relaxation dispersion nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to determine the structure of a low-populated, on-pathway folding intermediate of the A39V/N53P/V55L (A, Ala; V, Val; N, Asn; P, Pro; L, Leu) Fyn SH3 domain. The carboxyl terminus remains disordered in this intermediate, thereby exposing the aggregation-prone amino-terminal β strand. Accordingly, mutants lacking the carboxyl terminus and thus mimicking the intermediate fail to safeguard the folding route and spontaneously form fibrillar aggregates. The structure provides a detailed characterization of the non-native interactions stabilizing an aggregation-prone intermediate under native conditions and insight into how such an intermediate can derail folding and initiate fibrillation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Canada 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 331 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 104 29%
Researcher 99 28%
Student > Master 25 7%
Professor 23 6%
Student > Bachelor 18 5%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 37 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 142 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 70 20%
Chemistry 54 15%
Physics and Astronomy 16 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 2%
Other 23 6%
Unknown 46 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,302,229
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Science
#29,969
of 83,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,345
of 175,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#312
of 835 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 835 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.