↓ Skip to main content

An exploratory study of reiki experiences in women who have cancer

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Palliative Nursing, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An exploratory study of reiki experiences in women who have cancer
Published in
International Journal of Palliative Nursing, April 2016
DOI 10.12968/ijpn.2016.22.4.166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marilynne N Kirshbaum, Maxine Stead, Serena Bartys

Abstract

To explore the perceptions and experiences of reiki for women who have cancer and identify outcome measures for an intervention study. A cross-sectional qualitative study of 10 women who had received reiki after cancer treatment was conducted. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and coded using framework analysis. Key themes identified were: limited understanding of reiki prior to receiving any reiki; release of emotional strain during reiki-feelings of a release of energy, a clearing of the mind from cancer, inner peace/relaxation, hope, a sense of being cared for; experience of physical sensations during reiki, such as pain relief and tingling; physical, emotional and cognitive improvements after reiki, such as improved sleep, a sense of calm and peace, reduced depression and improved self-confidence. Findings suggest that reiki could be a beneficial tool in the self-management of quality of life issues for women who have cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Student > Master 16 13%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 39 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 44 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Psychology 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 40 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,730,464
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Palliative Nursing
#170
of 603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,982
of 301,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Palliative Nursing
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 603 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.