| Title |
Direct Patterning of Carbon Nanotube via Stamp Contact Printing Process for Stretchable and Sensitive Sensing Devices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nano-Micro Letters, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40820-019-0323-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Binghao Liang, Zian Zhang, Wenjun Chen, Dongwei Lu, Leilei Yang, Rongliang Yang, Hai Zhu, Zikang Tang, Xuchun Gui |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 12 | 24% |
| Engineering | 5 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#20,590,073
of 23,175,240 outputs
Outputs from Nano-Micro Letters
#912
of 989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,349
of 360,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano-Micro Letters
#14
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,175,240 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 989 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.