↓ Skip to main content

Flow-regulated versus differential pressure valves for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: comparison of overdrainage rates and neurological outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurochirurgica, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Flow-regulated versus differential pressure valves for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: comparison of overdrainage rates and neurological outcome
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00701-019-04088-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Wetzel, Lukas Goertz, Philipp Noé, Niklas von Spreckelsen, Marina Penner, Christoph Kabbasch, Roland Goldbrunner, Boris Krischek

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 35%
Neuroscience 2 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Unknown 8 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,230,578
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#499
of 2,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,514
of 375,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#15
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,143 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.