| Title |
Increasing numbers and intercontinental spread of invasive insects on eucalypts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-016-1081-x |
| Authors |
Brett P. Hurley, Jeff Garnas, Michael J. Wingfield, Manuela Branco, David M. Richardson, Bernard Slippers |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 31 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 65 | 52% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 34 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#750,458
of 24,858,211 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#87
of 2,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,068
of 303,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#4
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,858,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.