| Title |
A review of exfoliated graphite
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-015-9284-6 |
| Authors |
D. D. L. Chung |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 320 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 18% |
| Researcher | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 45 | 14% |
| Unknown | 89 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 59 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 56 | 17% |
| Materials Science | 49 | 15% |
| Chemical Engineering | 24 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 8% |
| Unknown | 102 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,474,838
of 23,873,907 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#102
of 4,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,174
of 265,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,873,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,730 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.