You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An Atlas-Based Electron Density Mapping Method for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Alone Treatment Planning and Adaptive MRI-Based Prostate Radiation Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.056 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason A. Dowling, Jonathan Lambert, Joel Parker, Olivier Salvado, Jurgen Fripp, Anne Capp, Chris Wratten, James W. Denham, Peter B. Greer |
| Abstract |
Prostate radiation therapy dose planning directly on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans would reduce costs and uncertainties due to multimodality image registration. Adaptive planning using a combined MRI-linear accelerator approach will also require dose calculations to be performed using MRI data. The aim of this work was to develop an atlas-based method to map realistic electron densities to MRI scans for dose calculations and digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) generation. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 214 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 23% |
| Researcher | 46 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 16% |
| Unknown | 39 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 61 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 20 | 9% |
| Engineering | 19 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 54 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,798,611
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#1,564
of 11,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,220
of 255,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#10
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.