| Title |
Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Metabolomics, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11306-007-0082-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lloyd W. Sumner, Alexander Amberg, Dave Barrett, Michael H. Beale, Richard Beger, Clare A. Daykin, Teresa W.-M. Fan, Oliver Fiehn, Royston Goodacre, Julian L. Griffin, Thomas Hankemeier, Nigel Hardy, James Harnly, Richard Higashi, Joachim Kopka, Andrew N. Lane, John C. Lindon, Philip Marriott, Andrew W. Nicholls, Michael D. Reily, John J. Thaden, Mark R. Viant |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Greece | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 31 | 49% |
| Members of the public | 25 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1348 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 298 | 22% |
| Researcher | 230 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 144 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 100 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 80 | 6% |
| Other | 199 | 15% |
| Unknown | 321 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 250 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 216 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 196 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 59 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 4% |
| Other | 188 | 14% |
| Unknown | 411 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#686,845
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Metabolomics
#13
of 1,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,038
of 85,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolomics
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them