↓ Skip to main content

Spine maturation and pruning during development: Cadherin/Catenin complexes come to help

Overview of attention for article published in Science China Life Sciences, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Spine maturation and pruning during development: Cadherin/Catenin complexes come to help
Published in
Science China Life Sciences, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11427-015-4933-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheng Qian, YuLong Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 43%
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 57%
Computer Science 1 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,453,763
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Science China Life Sciences
#623
of 1,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,600
of 268,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Life Sciences
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.