↓ Skip to main content

Negative impact of waiting time for primary total knee arthroplasty on satisfaction and patient-reported outcome

Overview of attention for article published in International Orthopaedics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Negative impact of waiting time for primary total knee arthroplasty on satisfaction and patient-reported outcome
Published in
International Orthopaedics, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00264-016-3209-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla, Daniel Martinez-Mendez, Fernando A. Miralles-Muñoz, Luis Marco-Gomez, Fernando A. Lopez-Prats

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the time on waiting list for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the post-operative satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes. This was a prospective observational study of 192 patients followed for one year. Patients were pre and post-operatively assessed with the 12-item Short-Form, reduced Western Ontario MacMaster University, and Knee Society scores. In addition, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale was used at time of admission, and patient satisfaction on a five point Likert scale at one post-operative year. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Patients waiting longer than six months had significantly worse pre-operative anxiety score as well as post-operative SF12 (both physical and mental) and KSS-function scores compared to those with a waiting time shorter than six months. Dissatisfaction rate was also higher in patients waiting longer than six months, and it was mainly influenced by pre-operative anxiety and depression. Waiting time longer than six months negatively influenced post-operative satisfaction and patient-related outcome at one year after TKA. These findings may have important clinical implications regarding the prioritization of patients on wait lists or for optimization of treatment while patients wait for surgery related to the management of the mental health and anxiety in order to reduce post-operative dissatisfaction and improve patient-reported outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 9 7%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 31 24%
Unknown 38 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Psychology 8 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 44 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2016.
All research outputs
#13,115,987
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from International Orthopaedics
#734
of 1,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,352
of 299,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Orthopaedics
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,433 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.