| Title |
Don’t foredoom cannabis legalization to failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.71136 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael J Armstrong, Dan Malleck |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 33% |
| Librarian | 2 | 22% |
| Researcher | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 11% |
| Engineering | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2021.
All research outputs
#726,441
of 23,175,240 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,149
of 8,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,721
of 438,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#25
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,175,240 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.