↓ Skip to main content

Pathogenic archaea: do they exist?

Overview of attention for article published in BioEssays, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
13 X users
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathogenic archaea: do they exist?
Published in
BioEssays, October 2003
DOI 10.1002/bies.10354
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo Cavicchioli, Paul M.G. Curmi, Neil Saunders, Torsten Thomas

Abstract

Archaea are microorganisms that are distinct from bacteria and eukaryotes. They are prevalent in extreme environments, and yet found in most ecosystems. They are a natural component of the microbiota of most, if not all, humans and other animals. Despite their ubiquity and close association with humans, animals and plants, no pathogenic archaea have been identified. Because no archaeal pathogens have yet been identified, there is a general assumption that archaeal pathogens do not exist. This review examines whether this is a good assumption by investigating the potential for archaea to be or become pathogens. This is achieved by addressing: the diversity of archaea versus known pathogens, opportunities for archaea to demonstrate pathogenicity and be detected as pathogens, reports linking archaea with disease, and immune responses to archaea. In addition, molecular and genomic data are examined for the presence of systems utilised in pathogenesis. The view of this report is that, although archaea can presently be described as non-pathogenic, they have the potential to be (discovered as) pathogens. The present optimistic view that there are no archaeal pathogens is tainted by a severe lack of relevant knowledge, which may have important consequences in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 193 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 26%
Student > Master 30 14%
Researcher 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 34 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 7%
Environmental Science 11 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 40 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,415,351
of 25,121,016 outputs
Outputs from BioEssays
#174
of 3,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,441
of 58,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioEssays
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,121,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.