↓ Skip to main content

Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines 2013 for the treatment of uterine body neoplasms

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Oncology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines 2013 for the treatment of uterine body neoplasms
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10147-016-0981-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasuhiko Ebina, Hidetaka Katabuchi, Mikio Mikami, Satoru Nagase, Nobuo Yaegashi, Yasuhiro Udagawa, Hidenori Kato, Kaneyuki Kubushiro, Kiyoshi Takamatsu, Kazuhiko Ino, Hiroyuki Yoshikawa

Abstract

The third version of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines for the treatment of uterine body neoplasms was published in 2013. The guidelines comprise nine chapters and nine algorithms. Each chapter includes a clinical question, recommendations, background, objectives, explanations, and references. This revision was intended to collect up-to-date international evidence. The highlights of this revision are to (1) newly specify costs and conflicts of interest; (2) describe the clinical significance of pelvic lymph node dissection and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, including variant histologic types; (3) describe more clearly the indications for laparoscopic surgery as the standard treatment; (4) provide guidelines for post-treatment hormone replacement therapy; (5) clearly differentiate treatment of advanced or recurrent cancer between the initial treatment and the treatment carried out after the primary operation; (6) collectively describe fertility-sparing therapy for both atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrioid adenocarcinoma (corresponding to G1) and newly describe relapse therapy after fertility-preserving treatment; and (7) newly describe the treatment of trophoblastic disease. Overall, the objective of these guidelines is to clearly delineate the standard of care for uterine body neoplasms in Japan with the goal of ensuring a high standard of care for all Japanese women diagnosed with uterine body neoplasms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 51%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2016.
All research outputs
#12,954,142
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#290
of 914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,650
of 298,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 914 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.