↓ Skip to main content

Hairstyle as an adaptive means of displaying phenotypic quality

Overview of attention for article published in Human Nature, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
11 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Hairstyle as an adaptive means of displaying phenotypic quality
Published in
Human Nature, September 2004
DOI 10.1007/s12110-004-1008-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norbert Mesko, Tamas Bereczkei

Abstract

Although facial features that are considered beautiful have been investigated across cultures using the framework of sexual selection theory, the effects of head hair on esthetic evaluations have rarely been examined from an evolutionary perspective. In the present study the effects of six hair-styles (short, medium-length, long, disheveled, knot [hair bun], unkempt) on female facial attractiveness were examined in four dimensions (femininity, youth, health, sexiness) relative to faces without visible head hair ("basic face"). Three evolutionary hypotheses were tested (covering hypothesis, healthy mate theory, and good genes model); only the good genes model was supported by our data. According to this theory, individuals who can afford the high costs of long hair are those who have good phenotypic and genetic quality. In accordance with this hypothesis, we found that only long and medium-length hair had a significant positive effect on ratings of women's attractiveness; the other hairstyles did not influence the evaluation of their physical beauty. Furthermore, these two hairstyles caused a much larger change in the dimension of health than in the rest of the dimensions. Finally, male raters considered the longer-haired female subjects' health status better, especially if the subjects were less attractive women. The possible relationships between facial attractiveness and hair are discussed, and alternative explanations are presented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Hungary 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
France 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 85 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 18%
Student > Master 14 15%
Researcher 11 12%
Other 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 25 27%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 13%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,007,279
of 24,832,302 outputs
Outputs from Human Nature
#110
of 544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,030
of 68,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Nature
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,832,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them