↓ Skip to main content

Could ocean acidification influence epiphytism? A comparison of carbon-use strategies between Fucus vesiculosus and its epiphytes in the Baltic Sea

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Phycology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Could ocean acidification influence epiphytism? A comparison of carbon-use strategies between Fucus vesiculosus and its epiphytes in the Baltic Sea
Published in
Journal of Applied Phycology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10811-019-01953-z
Authors

Gerli Albert, Christopher D. Hepburn, Liina Pajusalu, Tiina Paalme, Daniel W. Pritchard, Georg Martin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 9%
Unspecified 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,155,046
of 23,175,240 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#169
of 2,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,201
of 457,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#4
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,175,240 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,566 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.