| Title |
Applying behavioural science to increase uptake of the NHS Health Check: a randomised controlled trial of gain- and loss-framed messaging in the national patient information leaflet
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7754-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalie Gold, Caroline Durlik, Jet G. Sanders, Katherine Thompson, Tim Chadborn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 18% |
| Psychology | 10 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,283,818
of 23,175,240 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,651
of 15,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,132
of 360,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#180
of 316 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,175,240 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 316 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.