↓ Skip to main content

Outcomes Following ACL Reconstruction Based on Graft Type: Are all Grafts Equivalent?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
Title
Outcomes Following ACL Reconstruction Based on Graft Type: Are all Grafts Equivalent?
Published in
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12178-019-09588-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Widner, Mark Dunleavy, Scott Lynch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 208 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Student > Postgraduate 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Other 17 8%
Researcher 14 7%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 83 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 97 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,005,224
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
#207
of 544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,981
of 358,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.