| Title |
Tissue classification by rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS): comparison between a diathermic knife and CO2 laser sampling on classification performance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-019-02148-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michele Genangeli, Ron M. A. Heeren, Tiffany Porta Siegel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,055,192
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#4,501
of 9,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,009
of 379,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#46
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,810 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.