↓ Skip to main content

Attitudes Toward HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in a United States Urban Clinic Population

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Attitudes Toward HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in a United States Urban Clinic Population
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10461-016-1407-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helena A. Kwakwa, Sophia Bessias, Donielle Sturgis, Natasha Mvula, Rahab Wahome, Catelyn Coyle, Timothy P. Flanigan

Abstract

A majority of US studies on attitudes toward PrEP focus on men who have sex with men with little representation of African Americans. This cross-sectional study seeks to determine openness to PrEP, and examine motivations for openness among Philadelphia residents. Patients undergoing HIV rapid testing between May 2012 and December 2014 in a public setting were administered a survey. Questions included openness to PrEP and reasons for openness to PrEP. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to investigate associations between openness and potential predictors. Analyses were conducted using R version 3.2.4 and the epitools and car packages. Of 5606 respondents, over 90 % were African American. Men were more likely to express openness (61.4 % of men, 54.8 % of women, p < 0.0001). Predictors of openness were younger age, black race, higher perceived risk for HIV by patient or as assessed by Tester, intermittent /no condom use, greater number of partners in 12 months and previous HIV testing. The main reason for openness was fear of HIV, and for disinterest was lack of recognition of risk. Understanding openness to PrEP, and reasons for openness to or disinterest in PrEP are critical to determining the best approaches to facilitate engagement in PrEP care by communities and persons at elevated risk for HIV acquisition. Further study is needed on how best to manage disinterest in PrEP by those at high risk for HIV, and how openness to PrEP translates into concrete steps to take PrEP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Unknown 135 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 32 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 15%
Social Sciences 20 15%
Psychology 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 37 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2016.
All research outputs
#5,139,286
of 25,398,331 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#750
of 3,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,108
of 312,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#18
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,398,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.