| Title |
Appropriateness of inpatient stress testing: Implications for development of clinical decision support mechanisms and future criteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12350-019-01955-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sanjay Divakaran, Avinainder Singh, Ersilia M. DeFilippis, Timothy W. Churchill, Sarah Cuddy, Yin Ge, Ivan K. Ip, Wunan Zhou, Hicham Skali, Viviany R. Taqueti, Sharmila Dorbala, James Spalding, Yanqing Xu, Ramin Khorasani, Marcelo F. Di Carli, Maria A. Yialamas, Ron Blankstein, for the Brigham and Women’s Hospital Internal Medicine Residency |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 64% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
| Psychology | 2 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,648,998
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#227
of 2,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,280
of 471,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#8
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.