↓ Skip to main content

The majority of triple-negative breast cancer may correspond to basal-like carcinoma, but triple-negative breast cancer is not identical to basal-like carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Molecular Morphology, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
The majority of triple-negative breast cancer may correspond to basal-like carcinoma, but triple-negative breast cancer is not identical to basal-like carcinoma
Published in
Medical Molecular Morphology, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00795-008-0428-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naoto Kuroda, Masahiko Ohara, Kaori Inoue, Keiko Mizuno, Nokiaki Fujishima, Nobumasa Hamaguchi, Gang-Hong Lee

Abstract

Recently, the concept of basal-like carcinoma has been proposed. However, there are only a few reports about the relationship between triple-negative cancer and basal-like carcinoma. In this article, we report the study of the expression of basal cell markers in 11 triple-negative cancers. Eight tumors (4 metaplastic carcinomas, 2 invasive ductal carcinomas, 1 invasive papillary carcinoma, and 1 medullary carcinoma) were positive for more than three markers among cytokeratins 5, 14, and 17, and p63. Three tumors (2 invasive ductal carcinomas and 1 apocrine carcinoma) were completely negative for all markers. Among 8 tumors positive for basal markers, cytokeratins 5 and 17 were expressed in all 8 tumors, cytokeratin 14 in 6 tumors, and p63 in 7 tumors. Finally, we conclude that the majority of triple-negative cancer may correspond to basal-like carcinoma, but the two entities are not identical. The use of combination immunohistochemistry including cytokeratins 5, 14, and 17 and p63 may contribute to the detection of basal-like carcinoma.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 26%