You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multiple conceptualizations of nature are key to inclusivity and legitimacy in global environmental governance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science & Policy, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.018 |
| Authors |
Luca Coscieme, Håkon da Silva Hyldmo, Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares, Ignacio Palomo, Tuyeni H. Mwampamba, Odirilwe Selomane, Nadia Sitas, Pedro Jaureguiberry, Yasuo Takahashi, Michelle Lim, Maria P. Barral, Juliana S. Farinaci, Julio Diaz-José, Sonali Ghosh, Joyce Ojino, Amani Alassaf, Bernard N. Baatuuwie, Lenke Balint, Zeenatul Basher, Fanny Boeraeve, Sugeng Budiharta, Ruishan Chen, Maylis Desrousseaux, Gregory Dowo, Catherine Febria, Houda Ghazi, Zuzana V. Harmáčková, Rodolfo Jaffe, Mphatso M. Kalemba, Cosmas K. Lambini, Felicia P.S. Lasmana, Assem A.A. Mohamed, Aidin Niamir, Patricio Pliscoff, Rahat Sabyrbekov, Uttam B. Shrestha, Aibek Samakov, Anna A. Sidorovich, Laura Thompson, Mireia Valle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 9% |
| Germany | 5 | 6% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| Argentina | 4 | 5% |
| Ireland | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| France | 3 | 4% |
| Sweden | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 68% |
| Scientists | 23 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 215 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 16% |
| Unknown | 66 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 40 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 30 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 3% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 81 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#624,884
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Policy
#71
of 2,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,771
of 476,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Policy
#1
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.