| Title |
Distinguishing changes in the Hadley circulation edge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Climatology, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00704-019-03017-1 |
| Authors |
Hyejin Moon, Kyung-Ja Ha |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 17% |
| Psychology | 1 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,469,259
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Climatology
#418
of 1,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,844
of 360,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Climatology
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.