↓ Skip to main content

Can a low-carbon development path achieve win-win development: evidence from China’s low-carbon pilot policy

Overview of attention for article published in Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Can a low-carbon development path achieve win-win development: evidence from China’s low-carbon pilot policy
Published in
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11027-019-09897-y
Authors

Cenjie Liu, Zhongbao Zhou, Qing Liu, Rui Xie, Ximei Zeng

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 13 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 5 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 12%
Engineering 2 8%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 13 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,505,282
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#227
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,738
of 462,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.