↓ Skip to main content

Homozygous Variant in ARL3 Causes Autosomal Recessive Cone Rod Dystrophy

Overview of attention for article published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Homozygous Variant in ARL3 Causes Autosomal Recessive Cone Rod Dystrophy
Published in
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, November 2019
DOI 10.1167/iovs.19-27263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shakeel A. Sheikh, Robert A. Sisk, Cara R. Schiavon, Yar M. Waryah, Muhammad A. Usmani, David H. Steel, John A. Sayer, Ashok K. Narsani, Robert B. Hufnagel, Saima Riazuddin, Richard A. Kahn, Ali M. Waryah, Zubair M. Ahmed

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 21%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,480,262
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
#2,327
of 7,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,148
of 471,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
#25
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.