↓ Skip to main content

A Bayesian compressed-sensing approach for reconstructing neural connectivity from subsampled anatomical data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computational Neuroscience, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
A Bayesian compressed-sensing approach for reconstructing neural connectivity from subsampled anatomical data
Published in
Journal of Computational Neuroscience, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10827-012-0390-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuriy Mishchenko, Liam Paninski

Abstract

In recent years, the problem of reconstructing the connectivity in large neural circuits ("connectomics") has re-emerged as one of the main objectives of neuroscience. Classically, reconstructions of neural connectivity have been approached anatomically, using electron or light microscopy and histological tracing methods. This paper describes a statistical approach for connectivity reconstruction that relies on relatively easy-to-obtain measurements using fluorescent probes such as synaptic markers, cytoplasmic dyes, transsynaptic tracers, or activity-dependent dyes. We describe the possible design of these experiments and develop a Bayesian framework for extracting synaptic neural connectivity from such data. We show that the statistical reconstruction problem can be formulated naturally as a tractable L₁-regularized quadratic optimization. As a concrete example, we consider a realistic hypothetical connectivity reconstruction experiment in C. elegans, a popular neuroscience model where a complete wiring diagram has been previously obtained based on long-term electron microscopy work. We show that the new statistical approach could lead to an orders of magnitude reduction in experimental effort in reconstructing the connectivity in this circuit. We further demonstrate that the spatial heterogeneity and biological variability in the connectivity matrix--not just the "average" connectivity--can also be estimated using the same method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Israel 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
China 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 38%
Researcher 18 31%
Professor 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 2 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 12 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 21%
Physics and Astronomy 9 16%
Engineering 8 14%
Computer Science 6 10%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 4 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2012.
All research outputs
#15,243,120
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#168
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,426
of 160,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.