You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Olfactory modulation of affective touch processing — A neurophysiological investigation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NeuroImage, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.046 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ilona Croy, Edda Drechsler, Paul Hamilton, Thomas Hummel, Håkan Olausson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 25 | 24% |
| Psychology | 24 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2016.
All research outputs
#6,587,541
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#5,238
of 12,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,701
of 315,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#97
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.