You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Nutritious Eating with Soul (NEW Soul) Study: Study design and methods of a two-year randomized trial comparing culturally adapted soul food vegan vs. omnivorous diets among African American adults at risk for heart disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Contemporary Clinical Trials, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105897 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy, Sara Wilcox, Edward A Frongillo, Angela Murphy, Brent Hutto, Kim Williams, Anthony Crimarco, Mary Wilson, Marty Davey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 57% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 168 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 78 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 14% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 87 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,691,201
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Contemporary Clinical Trials
#266
of 1,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,280
of 358,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contemporary Clinical Trials
#4
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.