| Title |
Factors affecting use of unscheduled care for people with advanced cancer: a retrospective cohort study in Scotland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x706637 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Mills, Deans Buchanan, Bruce Guthrie, Peter Donnan, Blair Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 71% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,401,608
of 24,749,767 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,500
of 4,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,278
of 468,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#34
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,749,767 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,610 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 468,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.