You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Daily fluctuations in pollination effectiveness explain higher efficiency of native over exotic bees in Lepechinia floribunda (Lamiaceae).
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Botany, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/aob/mcz187 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matias Cristian Baranzelli, Santiago Benitez-Vieyra, Evangelina Glinos, Alejandra Trenchi, Silvina Córdoba, Julia Camina, Lorena Ashworth, Alicia Noemi Sérsic, Andrea Aristides Cocucci, Juan Fornoni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 3 | 21% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,385,994
of 23,868,903 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#669
of 3,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,240
of 462,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#20
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,868,903 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.