↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating Facilitated Modelling Processes and Outcomes: An Experiment Comparing a Single and a Multimethod Approach in Group Model Building

Overview of attention for article published in Group Decision and Negotiation, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 161)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating Facilitated Modelling Processes and Outcomes: An Experiment Comparing a Single and a Multimethod Approach in Group Model Building
Published in
Group Decision and Negotiation, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10726-016-9480-z
Authors

Hugo J. Herrera, Marleen H. F. McCardle-Keurentjes, Nuno Videira

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Master 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 13 22%
Environmental Science 8 14%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Engineering 4 7%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 17 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,211,082
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Group Decision and Negotiation
#28
of 161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,665
of 272,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Group Decision and Negotiation
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.