↓ Skip to main content

Use of complementary and alternative medicine by children in Europe: Published data and expert perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Complementary Therapies in Medicine, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of complementary and alternative medicine by children in Europe: Published data and expert perspectives
Published in
Complementary Therapies in Medicine, February 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.ctim.2012.01.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tycho J. Zuzak, Johanna Boňková, Domenico Careddu, Miklós Garami, Adamos Hadjipanayis, Janez Jazbec, Joav Merrick, Joyce Miller, Candan Ozturk, Ingrid A.L. Persson, Guenka Petrova, Pablo Saz Peiró, Simon Schraub, A. Paula Simões-Wüst, Aslak Steinsbekk, Karin Stockert, Assena Stoimenova, Jan Styczynski, Alexandra Tzenova-Savova, Søren Ventegodt, Arine M. Vlieger, Alfred Längler

Abstract

Few data document the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in Europe, with even fewer investigating use by children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 142 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 33 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 39 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,542,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Complementary Therapies in Medicine
#370
of 1,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,208
of 255,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Complementary Therapies in Medicine
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.