↓ Skip to main content

Optimum committee size: Quality-versus-quantity dilemma

Overview of attention for article published in Social Choice and Welfare, June 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Optimum committee size: Quality-versus-quantity dilemma
Published in
Social Choice and Welfare, June 2003
DOI 10.1007/s003550200190
Authors

Drora Karotkin, Jacob Paroush

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 5 26%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 37%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Computer Science 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2019.
All research outputs
#19,221,261
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Social Choice and Welfare
#374
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,550
of 51,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Choice and Welfare
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them