↓ Skip to main content

Meta-Regulation in Practice: Beyond Normative Views of Morality and Rationality by F.C. Simon

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Meta-Regulation in Practice: Beyond Normative Views of Morality and Rationality by F.C. Simon
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10551-019-04354-x
Authors

Gordon G. Sollars

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#15,588,553
of 23,175,240 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,102
of 2,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,466
of 358,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#65
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,175,240 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.