| Title |
Correction to: International prospective observational cohort study of Zika in infants and pregnancy (ZIP study): study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12884-019-2589-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jill F. Lebov, Juan F. Arias, Angel Balmaseda, William Britt, José F. Cordero, Luiz Augusto Galvão, Ana Lucía Garces, K. Michael Hambidge, Eva Harris, Albert Ko, Nancy Krebs, Ernesto T. A. Marques, Alexander M. Martinez, Elizabeth McClure, Democrito B. Miranda-Filho, Maria Elisabeth Lopes Moreira, Marisa M. Mussi-Pinhata, Theresa J. Ochoa, Jorge E. Osorio, Deolinda M. F. Scalabrin, Stacey Schultz-Cherry, George R. Seage, Kristen Stolka, César Augusto Ugarte-Gil, Carmen Milagros Velez Vega, Michael Welton, Ricardo Ximenes, Carmen Zorrilla |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 64% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,588,553
of 23,175,240 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#3,046
of 4,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,074
of 457,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#81
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,175,240 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.