↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors for recurrence of laryngeal amyloidosis treated by microforceps and CO2 laser

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Risk factors for recurrence of laryngeal amyloidosis treated by microforceps and CO2 laser
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00405-019-05730-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiufa Wu, Jing Zhang, Chunsheng Wei

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#20,590,073
of 23,175,240 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#2,075
of 3,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#382,905
of 457,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#28
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,175,240 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.