| Title |
Economic evaluation of meningococcal vaccines: considerations for the future
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10198-019-01129-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannah Christensen, Hareth Al-Janabi, Pierre Levy, Maarten J. Postma, David E. Bloom, Paolo Landa, Oliver Damm, David M. Salisbury, Javier Diez-Domingo, Adrian K. Towse, Paula K. Lorgelly, Koonal K. Shah, Karla Hernandez-Villafuerte, Vinny Smith, Linda Glennie, Claire Wright, Laura York, Raymond Farkouh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 40% |
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| Panama | 1 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 25 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,684,401
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#235
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,166
of 471,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.