You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The ecology of chronic wasting disease in wildlife
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Reviews, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/brv.12568 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luis E. Escobar, Sandra Pritzkow, Steven N. Winter, Daniel A. Grear, Megan S. Kirchgessner, Ernesto Dominguez‐Villegas, Gustavo Machado, A. Townsend Peterson, Claudio Soto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 41% |
| Canada | 6 | 22% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| Iceland | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 13 | 48% |
| Members of the public | 12 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 188 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 13% |
| Researcher | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
| Professor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 62 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 14 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 75 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 150. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#276,065
of 25,591,967 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#53
of 1,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,399
of 476,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,591,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.