| Title |
Long-term trends and a risk analysis of cetacean entanglements and bycatch in fisheries gear in Australian waters
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-019-01881-x |
| Authors |
Vivitskaia Tulloch, Vanessa Pirotta, Alana Grech, Susan Crocetti, Michael Double, Jason How, Catherine Kemper, Justin Meager, Victor Peddemors, Kelly Waples, Mandy Watson, Robert Harcourt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 8 | 14% |
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Romania | 1 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 28 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 75% |
| Scientists | 14 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 40 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 39 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,160,746
of 25,250,629 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#146
of 2,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,490
of 471,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#3
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,250,629 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.